Financial Class Action Settlements in New Mexico (2026)

27 days left

AAA Insurance $4.15M Class Action Settlement

AAA Insurance $4.15M Class

Individuals who purchased New Mexico AAA UM/UIM auto insurance or had a UIM claim offset between 2010 and 2022 may be eligible to claim up to $25,000.

$4,150,000 Total fund

28 days left

Liberty Mutual $6.5 Million New Mexico UM/UIM Settlement

Liberty Mutual $6.5 Million

Consumers who had Liberty Mutual or Safeco auto insurance with UM/UIM coverage in New Mexico may be eligible to claim up to $25,000 or a partial premium refund.

$6,500,000 Total fund

50 days left

Hartford Insurance - Underinsured Motorist Insurance (New Mexico)

Hartford Insurance - Underinsured

If you were a New Mexico policyholder or had underinsured motorist coverage with Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford or Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest, you may be covered by this settlement.

50 days left

Property and Casualty Insurance Co. of Hartford Settlement

Property and Casualty Insurance Co. of Hartford

Hartford policyholders in New Mexico with underinsured motorist coverage between 2014 and 2022 may benefit from a class action settlement.

Star214, Statebridge - Interest Fees

Star214, Statebridge - Interest

You may be included in this settlement if you were an obligor of a junior-lien mortgage loan secured by a primary residence and actively serviced by Statebridge.

🚨 5 days left

Statebridge Debt Collection Class Action Settlement

Statebridge Debt Collection

Consumers whom Statebridge charged interest on a junior-lien mortgage without providing statements may be eligible to receive a class action settlement payment.

Morton Community Bank - Overdraft Fees (Illinois)

Morton Community Bank

You may be included in this settlement if you are an Illinois resident who had a personal checking account with Morton Community Bank and were charged certain overdraft or non-sufficient fund fees.

⏰ 8 days left

Pacific Life Insurance $33M PDX Policy Class Action Settlement

Pacific Life Insurance $33M

Consumers who bought a Pacific Discovery Xelerator life insurance policy in California may be eligible to receive benefits from a class action settlement.

$33,000,000 Total fund

⏰ 8 days left

Pacific Life Insurance (California)

You may be included in this settlement if you paid for a Pacific Discovery Xelerator indexed universal life insurance policy in California.

⏰ 12 days left

Masimo $33.75 Million Class Action Securities Settlement

Masimo $33.75 Million Class

Investors who bought Masimo common stock between May 4, 2022, and Aug. 8, 2023, may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action settlement.

$33,750,000 Total fund

19 days left

Glacier Bank, Wheatland Bank $1.6M Class Action Settlement

Glacier Bank, Wheatland Bank

Job seekers who applied for a position with Glacier Bank or Wheatland Bank in Washington may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action settlement.

$1,600,000 Total fund

20 days left

AdaptHealth $35 Million Securities Class Action Settlement

AdaptHealth $35 Million Securities

Investors who purchased AdaptHealth common stock between Aug. 4, 2020, and Nov. 7, 2023, may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action settlement.

$35,000,000 Total fund

21 days left

State Farm Bank, Afni $110M Repossession Settlement

State Farm Bank, Afni

If State Farm Bank, Afni or others repossessed an individual's property, they may be eligible to receive cash and debt relief from a class action settlement.

$110,000,000 Total fund

25 days left

AlphaCentric $20M Securities Class Action Settlement

AlphaCentric $20M Securities Class

Investors who bought AlphaCentric Income Opportunities Fund shares from July 27, 2018, to March 22, 2020, may be eligible to claim a cash payment.

$20,000,000 Total fund

25 days left

PharMerica Pharmacy Breach

A 2023 ransomware attack exposed SSNs, medical info, and health insurance details of millions. Pro-rata cash without proof, up to $10,000 with documentation.

$10 — $10 Est. payout

26 days left

Veon Ltd. $19.97 Million Securities Class Action Settlement

Veon Ltd. $19.97 Million

Investors who bought Veon ADSs between June 30, 2011, and Nov. 3, 2015, and held them through March 12, 2014, may be eligible to claim a cash payment.

$19,970,000 Total fund

28 days left

Acadia Healthcare $179M Securities Class Action Settlement

Acadia Healthcare $179M Securities

Investors who bought Acadia Healthcare stock between April 30, 2014, and Nov. 15, 2018, may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action settlement.

$179,000,000 Total fund

28 days left

GMO-Z.com Trust $6.75M Gyen Class Action Settlement

GMO-Z.com Trust $6.75M Gyen

Investors who bought Gyen in New York or California when it was unpegged and lost money may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action settlement.

$6,750,000 Total fund

33 days left

PHH Mortgage - Default Notices

PHH Mortgage - Default

This settlement covers PHH residential mortgage borrowers who were sent default notices on or after January 14, 2021.

33 days left

District of Columbia $3.79M Title Insurance Settlement

District of Columbia $3.79M

Individuals who purchased title insurance in the District of Columbia through certain agents or companies may be eligible to claim $500 from a settlement.

$3,790,000 Total fund

33 days left

PHH Mortgage $1.5M Debt Collection Class Action Settlement

PHH Mortgage $1.5M Debt

Individuals who received a default notice from PHH Mortgage after Jan. 14, 2021, may be eligible to receive a cash payment from a class action settlement.

$1,500,000 Total fund

35 days left

Highcape Capital $7.6M Securities Class Action Settlement

Highcape Capital

Those who held HighCape Class A common stock between May 10, 2021, and June 10, 2021, may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action settlement.

$8 — $8 Est. payout

39 days left

Arqit Quantum $7M Securities Class Action Settlement

Arqit Quantum $7M Securities

Investors who held Centricus or Arqit securities between July 26, 2021, and Dec. 13, 2022, may be eligible to claim cash from a class action settlement.

$7,000,000 Total fund

39 days left

America First Credit Union $850K Wage and Hour Settlement

America First Credit Union

Individuals who worked as a nonexempt branch employee for America First Credit Union may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a collective action.

Driven Brands $25M Securities Class Action Settlement

Driven Brands $25M Securities

Investors who purchased Driven Brands stock between Oct. 27, 2021, and Aug. 1, 2023, may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action settlement.

$25,000,000 Total fund

43 days left

Mylan $60,000,000 Securities Class Action Settlement

Mylan $60,000,000 Securities Class

Investors who bought Mylan N.V. common stock between Feb. 16, 2016, and May 7, 2019, may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action settlement.

$60,000,000 Total fund

46 days left

Experience Sponsor EIC $17.75M Class Action Settlement

Experience Sponsor EIC

Investors who held EIC Class A common stock through May 3, 2021, may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a $17.75 million class action settlement.

$18 — $18 Est. payout

46 days left

Westlake Financial Services - Fees

Westlake Financial Services

You may be included in this settlement if you were charged a fee for making a payment on a Westlake Services account through ACI payments between June 20, 2022 and August 18, 2025.

48 days left

Hayward Holdings $19.85M Securities Class Action Settlement

Hayward Holdings $19.85M Securities

Investors who bought Hayward Holdings Inc. stock between Oct. 27, 2021, and July 28, 2022, may be eligible to claim a class action settlement payment.

$19,850,000 Total fund

48 days left

Doximity $31 Million Securities Class Action Settlement

Doximity $31 Million Securities

Investors who bought Doximity common stock between June 24, 2021, and Aug. 8, 2023, may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action settlement.

$31,000,000 Total fund

53 days left

CMLS III $7.25M Securities Class Action Settlement

CMLS III $7.25M Securities

Investors who held CMLS III Class A Common Stock after Dec. 14, 2021, may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action settlement.

$7,250,000 Total fund

54 days left

Capital One Financial Corporation Associate Savings Plan

Capital One Financial Corporation

If you were a participant or beneficiary of the Capital One Financial Corporation Associate Savings Plan between November 11, 2018 and January 13, 2026, you may be included in this settlement.

55 days left

Interactive Brokers $5M Securities Class Action Settlement

Interactive Brokers $5M Securities

Customers who had a margin account with Interactive Brokers liquidated by automated software may be eligible to claim cash from a class action settlement.

$5,000,000 Total fund

56 days left

GSX Techedu $9.5 Million Securities Class Action Settlement

GSX Techedu $9.5 Million

Investors who bought GSX Techedu ADSs between June 6, 2019, and Oct. 20, 2020, may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action settlement.

$9,500,000 Total fund

56 days left

Fidelity Information Services $210M Class Action Settlement

Fidelity Information Services $210M

Investors who bought FIS common stock between May 7, 2020, and Feb. 10, 2023, may be eligible to claim a share of a $210 million class action settlement.

$210,000,000 Total fund

Expensify $9.5M Securities Class Action Settlement

Expensify $9.5M Securities Class

Investors who bought Expensify Inc. stock in its 2021 IPO may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action settlement.

$9,500,000 Total fund

Gores Guggenheim $25M Securities Class Action Settlement

Gores Guggenheim $25M Securities

Investors who held GGI Class A common stock between Sept. 27, 2021, and June 23, 2022, may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action settlement.

$25,000,000 Total fund

Osprey BlackSky $7.5M Securities Class Action Settlement

Osprey BlackSky $7.5M Securities

Investors who held Osprey Class A common stock on Sept. 6, 2021, and did not redeem all of their shares may qualify to claim a cash settlement payment.

$7,500,000 Total fund

Hawaiian Electric $47.75M Securities Class Action Settlement

Hawaiian Electric $47.75M Securities

Investors who bought HEI stock between Feb. 28, 2019, and Sept. 4, 2023, may be eligible to claim cash from a class action settlement.

$47,750,000 Total fund

BioXcel Therapeutics $9.75M Class Action Settlement

BioXcel Therapeutics $9.75M Class

Investors who bought BioXcel Therapeutics stock between March 9 and June 28, 2023, may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action settlement.

$9,750,000 Total fund

PG&E Corp. $100M Securities Class Action Settlement

PG&E Corp. $100M Securities

Investors who bought PG&E securities from April 29, 2015, to Nov. 15, 2018, may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action settlement.

$100,000,000 Total fund

Lifecore $3.75M Securities Class Action Settlement

Lifecore $3.75M Securities Class

Investors who bought Lifecore Biomedical securities between Oct. 7, 2020, and Mar. 19, 2024, may be eligible to claim cash from a class action settlement.

$3,750,000 Total fund

SunPower Corp. $11M Securities Class Action Settlement

SunPower Corp. $11M Securities

Investors who bought SunPower Corp. stock or options between May 3, 2023, and July 19, 2024, may be eligible to claim cash from a class action settlement.

$11,000,000 Total fund

PHH - Mortgage Service Kickbacks

PHH - Mortgage Service

You may be included in this settlement if you obtained residential mortgage loans that originated or were acquired by PHH or its affiliates between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2009 and purchased private mortgage insurance in connection with the loan.

$875 — $875 Est. payout

PHH Mortgage Insurance Kickbacks Class Action Settlement

PHH Mortgage Insurance Kickbacks

Everything you need to know about the PHH mortgage insurance kickbacks settlement: eligibility, $875-per-loan benefit, deadlines, and how to claim by August 11, 2026.

$875 — $875 Est. payout

$5,000 — $10M Est. payout

Wells Fargo Fake Accounts Scandal Settlement

Wells Fargo & Company

Wells Fargo agreed to pay $3.7 billion in fines and restitution after employees created millions of unauthorized bank accounts, credit cards, and other financial products in customers' names.

Nationwide Pet Insurance Robocalls

Nationwide sent unsolicited prerecorded calls about pet insurance renewals. If you received robocalls from Nationwide about pet insurance since Jan 2021, you may qualify.

$17 — $17 Est. payout

Capital One 360 Savings

Capital One underpaid interest on 360 Savings accounts. If you had a Capital One 360 account from Sept 2019 to June 2025, you may qualify for a cash payment.

$250 — $250 Est. payout

Pendleton Community Bank $750K Overdraft Fee Settlement

Pendleton Community Bank

Individuals whom Pendleton Community Bank charged certain overdraft or NSF fees may qualify to receive a payment from a class action settlement.

$750 — $750 Est. payout

American Honda Finance Corporation

On January 17, 2025, the Bureau issued an order against American Honda Finance Corporation (Honda Finance) to address its violations relating to its furnishing of inaccurate consumer reporting information. Honda Finance is a nonbank and the captive automotive finance company for American Honda Motor Co., Inc., which is the sole authorized distributor of Honda and Acura motor vehicles in the United States. Honda Finance’s practices violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), its implementing regulation, Regulation V, and the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (CFPA). The Bureau found that, during the COVID-19 crisis, Honda Finance allowed consumers to defer payments and promised to continue reporting those consumers to the consumer reporting agencies (CRAs) as current, but instead, reported those consumers as delinquent when they did not make payments during the deferral period, in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). The Bureau also found that Honda Finance violated FCRA and its implementing Regulation V by continuing to furnish inaccurate and incomplete information after it determined the information was incomplete or inaccurate; failing to timely complete indirect dispute investigations and report the results of the investigations to CRAs; failing to establish and implement reasonable written policies and procedures regarding the accuracy and integrity of the information it furnished to CRAs; and failing to conduct reasonable investigations of direct disputes and timely report the results to consumers. The Bureau’s order requires Honda Finance to come into compliance with the law, pay $10.3 million in consumer redress, and pay a $2.5 million civil money penalty to the Bureau.

$10.3 million Total fund

Block, Inc.

On January 16, 2025, the Bureau issued an order against Block, Inc. (Block), a nonbank headquartered in Oakland, California which operates Cash App, a mobile payments application through which consumers can send and receive money through peer-to-peer transfers. The Bureau found that for years after the inception of Cash App, Block failed to provide effective customer service for Cash App, including by failing to provide live telephone agents, which prevented consumers from being able to have their financial issues addressed in a proper and timely fashion and resulted in fake customer service lines through which consumers’ information would be stolen, in a manner that was unfair in violation of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (CFPA). The Bureau also found that Block failed to take timely, appropriate, and effective measures to prevent, detect, limit, and address fraud on the Cash App platform in a manner that was unfair in violation of the CFPA. The Bureau further found that Block used the card network chargeback process as a substitute for fulfilling its obligations under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA) and Regulation E to investigate and resolve disputes about unauthorized transactions in a timely manner in violation of the CFPA’s prohibition on unfair practices. In addition, the Bureau found that Block engaged in deception by misrepresenting that it protected consumers from unauthorized transfers and had a telephone line to report such unauthorized transfers. The Bureau also found that Block failed to comply in multiple ways with the requirements of EFTA and Regulation E, including regarding error resolution. The order requires Block to change its practices to comply with the law, pay at least $75 million in redress to consumers, up to $120 million. The order further requires Block to pay $55 million in civil money penalties.

$75 million Total fund

Arete Financial Refunds

Arete Financial

FTC sends second payment to people who paid for student debt relief

Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

On January 7, 2025, the Bureau filed a lawsuit against Experian Information Solutions, Inc., one of the largest consumer reporting agencies in the country. Experian collects and organizes data on most adult Americans to generate consumer credit reports, which it sells to creditors and other businesses who are evaluating whether to offer consumers products, services, or opportunities such as credit lines, loans, jobs, and housing. To promote the accuracy and fairness of information in consumer credit reports, the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) gives consumers the right to dispute incomplete or inaccurate information in their credit file and requires consumer reporting agencies like Experian to forward such disputes to the company that originally provided the information (called the “furnisher”) for investigation. FCRA also requires consumer reporting agencies to reinvestigate such disputes and remove or correct any inaccurate, incomplete, or unverifiable information.

Performant Recovery, Inc.

On December 9, 2024, the Bureau issued an order against Performant Recovery, Inc., to address its unlawful collection activities involving student-loan borrowers who were attempting to bring their student loans out of default. Student loan borrowers who have defaulted on Federal Family Education Loan Program loans have a one-time right to rehabilitate their loans and bring their loans back into good standing by entering into a rehabilitation agreement and making a series of reasonable and affordable payments. If a borrower enters into a loan-rehabilitation agreement within 65 days of defaulting on the loan, the borrower is also not required to pay collection costs associated with the default. From 2015 to 2020, Performant used its control over the rehabilitation process to delay borrowers’ loan rehabilitations so that collection costs would be added to their loans. If borrowers in default called Performant to rehabilitate their loans within 65 days from default, Performant’s agents were instructed to do whatever they could to delay the borrowers’ rehabilitation until after 65 days had passed, allowing for the imposition of collection costs on the borrowers. Through these practices, Performant generated fees for itself while causing individual borrowers to incur thousands of dollars in additional costs added to their loan obligations. This conduct constituted unfair and abusive acts or practices in violation of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 and unfair and unconscionable means to collect or attempt to collect debts in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The order requires Performant to stop servicing and collecting on any student loan debt and to pay a $700,000 civil money penalty.

Navy Federal Credit Union

On November 7, 2024, the Bureau issued an order against Navy Federal Credit Union, headquartered in Vienna, Virginia. On July 1, 2025, pursuant to its authority under 12 U.S.C. § 5563(b)(3), the Bureau terminated the order and waived any alleged non-compliance therewith.

Goldman Sachs Bank USA

On October 23, 2024, the Bureau issued an order against Goldman Sachs Bank USA (Goldman). In December 2017, Goldman and Apple Inc. entered an agreement to offer Apple Card, a credit card integrated with Apple software that offers both market-rate APRs and interest-free financing for qualifying Apple products. Goldman agreed to extend the credit offered through Apple Card and to investigate disputes submitted by consumers. Apple designed the consumer-facing interfaces that consumers used to manage Apple Card accounts on Apple devices and developed the creative approach and design of Apple Card advertisements. Despite warnings to Goldman’s board on August 16, 2019 that the Apple Card disputes system was “not fully ready” due to technological issues, Goldman and Apple introduced the Apple card four days later on August 20, 2019. The Bureau found that Goldman violated the Truth in Lending Act and Regulation Z by failing to send acknowledgement notices and resolution letters within the required periods; making adverse reports to consumer reporting agencies regarding amounts disputed in billing error notices prior to completing the requirements for billing error resolution; failing to conduct reasonable investigations for disputes that qualified as billing error notices; and holding consumers liable for amounts at issue in claims of unauthorized use before conducting a reasonable investigation. The Bureau also found that Goldman violated the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 by engaging in unfair acts or practices through its delay in resolving transaction disputes. Separately, in December 2019, Goldman and Apple introduced Apple Card Monthly Installments (ACMI), which allowed Apple Card users to finance the purchase of certain Apple devices directly from Apple through the payment of interest-free monthly installments. The Bureau found that Goldman engaged in deceptive acts or practices by misleading consumers to expect that purchases of Apple devices would automa

$19.8 million Total fund

American Financial Benefits Center Refunds

American Financial Benefits Center

FTC sends a second payment to people who paid for student loan debt relief

Global Tel Link Corporation d/b/a ViaPath Technologies; Telmate, LLC d/b/a ViaPath Technologies; and TouchPay Holdings, LLC d/b/a GTL Financial Services

On November 14, 2024, the Bureau issued an order against Global Tel Link Corporation, d/b/a ViaPath Technologies (“Global Tel Link”), and its subsidiaries Telmate, LLC, d/b/a ViaPath Technologies (“Telmate”), and TouchPay Holdings, LLC, d/b/a GTL Financial Services (“TouchPay”). Together with its subsidiaries, Global Tel Link is one of the country’s largest providers of money transfer services to justice-involved consumers. Many consumers who are incarcerated rely on these money transfer services to receive from their friends and family the funds they need to pay for items in correctional facilities’ commissaries, including basic necessities such as food, medicine, and clothing. The Bureau found that Global Tel Link and its subsidiaries engaged in unfair acts or practices in violation of the Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFPA) by blocking consumers’ accounts when a money transfer was charged-back, which prevented friends and family consumers from sending, and incarcerated consumers from receiving, funds via debit card or credit card transfer. To get an account unblocked, friends and family consumers had to pay the amount of the chargeback plus, in some circumstances, a fee, even though they had not filed the chargeback. The Bureau also found that Global Tel Link and its subsidiaries engaged in unfair acts or practices in violation of the CFPA when they failed to disclose to consumers complete fee schedules for money transfers, depriving consumers of information that would allow them to understand how the payment channel, payment method, or amount they deposit may impact the fee they are charged for the money-transfer transaction. In addition to money transfer services, Global Tel Link and Telmate also provide “Unified Accounts” to friends and family consumers to pay for online messaging, video visitation, and telephone services so they can communicate with people who are incarcerated. The Bureau found that Global Tel Link and Telmate engaged in abusive acts or

$2 million Total fund

Climb Credit, Inc.; Climb Investco, LLC; Climb GS Loan Fund 2018-1, LLC; 1/0 Holdco LLC; and 1/0 Capital LLC

On October 17, 2024, the Bureau filed a lawsuit against Climb Credit, Inc.; its wholly owned subsidiary Climb Investco, LLC; its wholly owned sub-subsidiary Climb GS Loan Fund 2018-1, LLC; and the originators, initial owners, and initial operators of these entities, 1/0 Holdco LLC and 1/0 Capital LLC. 1/0 Holdco LLC and 1/0 Capital LLC are headquartered in New York and Climb Credit, Inc. was headquartered in New York during most of the time period relevant to this suit and continues to conduct a significant amount of its operations there. The Bureau alleged these entities (the Climb Enterprise) worked together in online student lending for short-term vocational programs at schools with whom Climb Credit, Inc. has partnered.

Wise US Inc.

On January 30, 2025, the Bureau issued an order against Wise US Inc., a nonbank remittance transfer provider headquartered in New York, New York. Wise is a subsidiary of Wise PLC, a publicly traded, global electronic money services corporation headquartered in the United Kingdom. Wise offers and provides consumers international money transfer services, known as remittance transfers, in 48 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico. Wise also offers a prepaid product to allow customers to store and receive money in multiple currencies, as well as spend money using an optional, attached debit card. The January 30, 2025 Order resolved the Bureau’s administrative proceeding against Wise US Inc. under 12 U.S.C. §§ 5563 and 5565, for (1) its use of deceptive marketing disclosures relating to ATM fees leading to ATM fee overcharges in violation of the Consumer Financial Protection Act’s (CFPA) prohibition on unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices, 12 U.S.C. §§ 5531, 5536, and (2) its failure to provide disclosures and notices, including change-in-term notices; failure to adhere to error resolution provisions and failure to correct errors; failure to comply with the retention of document requirements; and failure to develop and maintain policies and procedures that are designed to ensure compliance with error resolution requirements in violation of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1693 et seq., and its implementing Regulation E, 12 C.F.R. pt. 1005.

$44,955 Total fund